Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Thu93 2020

Last update18:06 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Issues > Activites
Gaffney’s First Amendment argument FAILS
Gaffney’s First Amendment argument FAILS
Washington Times columnist Frank Gaffney is throwing a temper tantrum because Paul Krugman called him and his newspaper out for putting forth hate speech. In a today’s column, entitled "Free speech, but not for me?" Gaffney says:
Tuesday, June 16,2009 08:39
Daily Kos

Washington Times columnist Frank Gaffney is throwing a temper tantrum because Paul Krugman called him and his newspaper out for putting forth hate speech.


In a today"s column, entitled "Free speech, but not for me?" Gaffney says:


I was surprised to see the New York Times columnist take a swipe at me and the paper that has long been my home. Since Frank Rich, another New York Times columnist, and numerous bloggers have all written essentially the same thing as Mr. Krugman, it is obvious that a new line of attack against conservatives is emerging. It needs to be stopped in its tracks.


Gaffney"s argument is that by criticizing him, Krugman is trying to deny him (Gaffney) his First Amendment rights. To find out why that FAILS, on so many levels, follow me below the fold.


ObamOcala"s diary :: ::

First of all, let"s all remember that critcism is not suppression. Simply calling what Gaffney wrote "hate speech" is not the same as saying Gaffney should be fined, imprisoned or otherwise prohibited from saying what he said. Krugman simply said:


...supposedly respectable news organizations and political figures are giving aid and comfort to dangerous extremism.


What will the consequences be? Nobody knows, of course, although the analysts at Homeland Security fretted that things may turn out even worse than in the 1990s — that thanks, in part, to the election of an African-American president, "the threat posed by lone wolves and small terrorist cells is more pronounced than in past years."


And that’s a threat to take seriously. Yes, the worst terrorist attack in our history was perpetrated by a foreign conspiracy. But the second worst, the Oklahoma City bombing, was perpetrated by an all-American lunatic. Politicians and media organizations wind up such people at their, and our, peril.


Note that nowhere does Krugman call for a law prohibiting newspapers and other media outlets from paying people like Gaffney to spew their garbage. He simply says responsible media outlets wouldn"t do it.


And therein lies the key to the failure of Gaffney"s protest that Krugman and other liberal pundits are trying to "silence" him.


The First Amendment gives Frank Gaffney the right to stand on a street corner or get up at a party and say anything he wants to say about President Obama (short of directly threatening to kill him or overtly calling upon others to do so, of course, which Gaffney has not done).


But the First Amendment doesn"t give him the right to flat-out make stuff up and then get paid to distribute the resulting drivel to a national audience.


Criticism of a president"s policies, and even of the president himself, is and should be, as Gaffney points out, fair game.


But taking a few lines from a president"s speech to a Muslim audience and using those lines to stoke fears that President Obama is in league with terrorists, or planning to impose Sharia law on Americans, clearly crosses the line of responsible criticism. Of course, one would not expect Gaffney himself to recognize that fact.


It should not, however, be too much to ask those who sign his paychecks to know where that line is drawn.


The Source

Posted in Activites  
Related Articles
Muslims & Democracy: A Précis
Diplomacy and Democracy Spending In the House
Satellite Democracy
The Road To Democracy: Peace or Violence In Lebanon?
How Not to Support Democracy in the Middle East
POMED’s Andrew Albertson on Obama and Democracy Promotion
Mauritania Delays Elections to Strengthen Democracy
Livni: Democracy Means More Than Just Elections
Freedom House Looks at Who is Undermining Democracy
EGYPT:’Obama Talks Democracy, Endorses Dictatorship’
POMED’s Andrew Albertson on Obama and Democracy Promotion
Obama must challenge authoritarian alternatives to democracy
Ditching or discussing democracy in Egypt?
Obama speech heralds New Beginnings for promoting democracy?
Obama in Egypt: A Vision for Democracy Promotion
Obama Told to Support Mideast Democracy
Carpenter and Wittes: Cook Wrong on Democracy Funding in Egypt
Egypt Dissidents Ask Obama To Push Arab Democracy
Obama’s speech in Egypt - spot the democracy indicators
Ditching democracy in Egypt?
Connecting With Muslims Requires Embracing Democracy
Supporting Lebanon’s Democracy