Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Thu93 2020

Last update18:06 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
Making Matters Worse in Afghanistan
Making Matters Worse in Afghanistan
Civilian deaths inflicted by American firepower in Afghanistan are generating deep-seated anti-Americanism, with some Afghans saying that even the Russians were less violent, argues Charles Pe?a.
Tuesday, March 16,2010 09:13
by Charles V. Pe?a Middle East Online

A recent NATO airstrike in the province of Uruzgan — against what was thought to be a convoy of Taliban insurgents on their way to attack Afghan and foreign military forces — killed at least 27 Afghan civilians, including four women and a child.

In February, more than 50 Afghan civilians are believed to have been killed in more than half a dozen US and NATO military operations.

The good news is that “collateral” civilian casualties have dropped since Gen. Stanley McChrystal took over as the commanding general in Afghanistan, and he has apologized publicly for the casualties on Afghan national television.

The bad news, however, is that — although they are fewer than before — civilian casualties are counterproductive to counterinsurgency.

Although there is a military component to successful counterinsurgency, it is largely about winning hearts and minds. Killing innocent civilians — even unintentionally — is a prescription for defeat.

Consider the aftermath of a US airstrike (targeting an alleged local Taliban leader) in March 2007 in the Kapisa province. Four generations of a single family were killed, including an 85-year-old man, four women, and four children ranging in age from five years to seven months.

According to one villager, “We used to hate the Russians much more than Americans. But now when we see all this happening, I am telling you Russians behave much better than the Americans.” The 7-year-old boy who survived the bombing said plainly enough about Americans: “I hate them.”

Such hatred harbored by a family member can become the impulse for turning someone into a terrorist.

For example, the suicide bomber responsible for killing 19 Israelis in Haifa at the beginning of October 2003 was a 29-year-old apprentice lawyer, Hanadi Jaradat — an educated woman with a good job who would not ordinarily fit a terrorist profile. But she had motivation: an Israeli crackdown that resulted in the shooting death of her brother and cousin.

Reportedly, Jaradat vowed revenge standing over her brother’s grave: “Your blood will not have been shed in vain. . . . The murderer will yet pay the price, and we will not be the only ones who are crying.”

After the Haifa bombing, family members said, “She carried out the attack in revenge for the killing of her brother and her cousin by the Israeli security forces.”

The Israelis justify their actions because they feel they must confront a direct and imminent mortal threat to the survival of their country. US actions in Afghanistan are more connected to the survival of US-created government, not the United States itself.

The Taliban per se is not a direct threat to America, and local al-Qaeda threats within Afghanistan are not necessarily the same as the pre-9/11 al-Qaeda threat to the United States. Indeed, even Osama bin Laden and the remnants of al-Qaeda leadership thought to be in Pakistan may no longer be an operational threat.

What the United States needs to recognize is that continued military operations in Afghanistan are not in the nation’s larger strategic interests.

We must be understand that foreign military occupation — however well intended and however successful at the tactical, operational level — is not the solution, but rather part of the problem because of the resentment it creates (both in Afghanistan and also the larger Muslim world).

We must be true to our own principle of self-determination and allow the Afghan government to be fully sovereign and make decisions for itself — even if they are not the same decisions we would make. Our only real criterion should be that the government in Kabul — even if it includes elements of the Taliban — not provide support or safe haven for al-Qaeda to attack America.

Charles V. Pe?a is Senior Fellow at the Independent Institute as well as a senior fellow with the Coalition for a Realistic Foreign Policy, former senior fellow with the George Washington University Homeland Security Policy Institute, and an adviser on the Straus Military Reform Project.             Source:

tags: NATO / Qaeda / Qaida / Taliban / 9/11 / anti-Americanism / anti-islam / Islamophobia / Israeli Security Forces / US Government / Islamophobia / Afghan government / Zwahry
Posted in  
Related Articles
Scotland: Fears rise as anti-racist and anti-Islam demos planned
Experts: Al-Qaeda New Generation becomes more vicious than Bin Laden and Al-Zawahiri
Talking to the Taliban
Taliban buying guns from former warlords
NATO troops kill Afghan cleric, officials say
Looking Under My Bed For Al Qaeda
House Testimony: The Paradoxes of Al Qaeda
Al-Qaeda's shadow over Taliban talks
The new wake of Al-Qaeda
Is al-Qaeda winning?
The End of Al-Qaeda
Did Al-Qaeda ever matter as much as we think it did?
Al-Qaeda threat used once again to justify war
US in Back-channel Talks with Afghan Taliban
Anti-Islam posters 'threaten public peace' in Switzerland
Some of our Clerics are no Better than the Taliban, Interview with Abdulkarim Soroush*
The Taliban’s Winning Strategy in Afghanistan
Six Experts on Negotiating with the Taliban
The Mumbai Attacks - Al Qaeda, Pakistani Proxies or Hindutva Backlash?
Al-Qaeda supporters back John McCain for president
“Anti-Islam Congress” in Cologne: European Parties Fail to Feed Resentment against Islam
Explaining 20 years of Al-Qaeda
9/11 Rumors That Become Conventional Wisdom
Muslim Brotherhood Denounced 9/11, U.S. Reaction Fueled Anti-Americanism
Active US Muslims Fight 9/11 Stigma
Bin Laden’s aims with 9/11 and Bush’s in Iraq:
Anatomy of power
9/11: Facts and Narratives
The US-NATO Preemptive Nuclear Doctrine: Trigger a Middle East Nuclear
NATO Genocide in Afghanistan
Senator: U.S. has become haven for war criminals
9/11 Is Over
The Scope of Clashes in the Middle East Since 9/11
9/11 conspiracy theorists multiply
Pulling the 9/11 Lynch Pin
John Esposito explains Islamism and rising anti-Americanism