Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Thu93 2020

Last update18:06 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Issues > Democracy
Either way, Zionists win in Britain’s confused election
Either way, Zionists win in Britain’s confused election
Stuart Littlewood argues that the emergence of the Conservative Party as the largest party in the UK parliament following the 6 May general election, in which Labour came second, will guarantee the continued stranglehold of Israel’s stooges over British politics and put British security at considerable risk.
Saturday, May 8,2010 17:37
by Stuart Littlewood redress.cc
The battle of the Israel stooges in Britain’s general election has ended inconclusively in what's called a "hung parliament" – i.e. no overall winner.

We can now expect a few days of horse-trading between David "I'm-a-Zionist" Cameron and Gordon “Me-too” Brown to see which stooge can form a credible government.

But regardless of who finally enters Number 10 Downing Street, the real winners will be the Zionists.

Either party chief will ensure Israel has a staunch friend who’s faithful to the thuggish regime. Cameron and Brown are both patrons of the Jewish National Fund and have surrounded themselves with lieutenants who are equally supportive of the Zionist entity's lawless expansion and barbaric conduct. Their loyalty to the British Crown is of course suspect, nevertheless many of them will occupy ministerial or key posts, especially in the Foreign Office and on intelligence, security and defence committees, as was the case under the previous Labour administration.
"The Israeli newspaper Haaretz reports how diplomats in the Israeli embassy heaved a sigh of relief when they heard about Clegg's poor showing on election day. They feared the Liberal Democrats would not be such a soft touch as the two main parties."

Britain’s safety and reputation are therefore the losers.

Both leaders are on such friendly terms with Israel's criminal élite that they wish to change our laws to protect them from arrest on war crimes charges and provide them with a safe haven.

Both talk earnestly of "our national interest" in these ticklish times, but where this potentially conflicts with the US-Israel interest it is feared that what's good for Britain will be sidelined.

The voting public have even elected to Parliament the former political director of the Conservative Friends of Israel, most of them no doubt blissfully unaware of his sympathies with the foreign power and the influence his promotional activities are intended to have on the party's already distorted foreign affairs thinking.

What happened, you might be wondering, to Nick Clegg and his Liberal Democrats who were such outsiders that they hadn't yet been groomed by Washington and Tel Aviv and were therefore relatively uncorrupted?

The Israeli newspaper Haaretz reports how diplomats in the Israeli embassy heaved a sigh of relief when they heard about Clegg's poor showing on election day. They feared the Liberal Democrats would not be such a soft touch as the two main parties.

Many of us warned that the sudden upsurge in their popularity after Clegg's acclaimed performance in the first leaders' TV debate would fizzle out. Why? When the talk turned to foreign policy and immigration their blind support for the EU, their unwillingness to throw out illegal immigrants and their inability to tackle the flood from Eastern Europe were laid bare.

My prediction a few weeks ago was that they would not achieve more than 24 to 25 per cent of the vote, and that is exactly what they’ve had to settle for.

During the election campaign some senior politicians have talked about the British political system being “broken”. It isn’t. Too many MPs are delinquent. They lack integrity and disregard the principles of public life. Party leaders have neither the will nor the moral backbone, it seems, to uphold those principles – such as not placing themselves under any financial or other obligation to outside individuals or organizations that might influence them in the performance of their official duties.

It is easier to blame the system than behave honourably.

We can expect more of that.

Stuart Littlewood is author of the book Radio Free Palestine, which tells the plight of the Palestinians under occupation. For further information please visit www.radiofreepalestine.co.uk.                         Source
tags: Zionist / Jews / Israeli Crimes / IOA / Muslims / Israeli Crimes / UK Parliament / Haaretz / Stuart Littlewood
Posted in Democracy , Palestine  
Related Articles
Zionist settlers burn olive trees in Hawara
Ghoul asks HRC to check IOA violation of prisoners' rights
IOA sentences child to 3 months imprisonment
IOA demolishes Palestinian home in Taiba
Ethiopian Jews experience Israeli racism at a very early age
The Holocaust isn’t just about Jews
Zionist provocative march in OJ next Sunday
Polanski?s ghost writer: Tony Blair and the absent Zionists and Israel lobbyists
Israeli Arabs urged to try 'reverse discrimination' against Jews
Hamas: Arresting Zionist war criminals is a must
Palestinian scholars appeal to Muslims to defend Aqsa Mosque by all means
Bahar calls for unitary national plan to face encroaching Zionist danger
Muslims, Race and the Blogosphere
Watch out: democratic Muslims about
With Blair-Bush Lies, Muslims Died
Is the Qur’an hostile to Jews and Christians?
Farouq: Egypt keeps quiet when it comes to Israeli crimes and takes actions to punish Palestinians
HRW: Israeli crimes in Gaza, Lebanon shame on humanity
Arab league condemns international silence towards Israeli crimes
MB Lawyers Call For Probe into Israeli Crimes
Haaretz: Yediot desisted from publishing photos of an Arab captive executed
Hamas: The talk about calm in light of the Israeli crimes is meaningless
Jews and the Gaza Holocaust
Haaretz: Israeli gov’t published a bid for building 440 settlement units in OJ
UK Parliament Seminar on Egypt on Tuesday 16th October