Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Thu93 2020

Last update18:06 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Archive > MB in International press
Why is the Arab world frozen in time?
Why is the Arab world frozen in time?
Why is it that at the beginning of the 21st century the Arab world seems stuck in time? Why are most Arabs still ruled by kings or military dictatorships? And specifically, why has the most populous Arab nation, Egypt, been governed by one man for nearly three decades?
Thursday, May 27,2010 08:06
by Kai Bird

Editor's note: Kai Bird is a Pulitzer Prize-winning historian and biographer. He has also won the National Book Critics Circle Award. His most recent book is "Crossing Mandelbaum Gate: Coming of Age Between the Arabs and Israelis, 1956-1978."

(CNN) -- Arab modernity. Why is it that at the beginning of the 21st century the Arab world seems stuck in time? Why are most Arabs still ruled by kings or military dictatorships? And specifically, why has the most populous Arab nation, Egypt, been governed by one man for nearly three decades?

President Hosni Mubarak, a former general, came to power in the aftermath of Anwar Sadat's assassination in October 1981. He has ruled Egypt ever since under a state of emergency.

Last week, Mubarak's regime extended for another two years a Draconian emergency law that permits police to detain individuals indefinitely, prohibits unauthorized assembly and severely restricts freedom of speech.

We Americans should care about this state of affairs. Mubarak's regime exists in part because our tax dollars subsidize this dictatorship to the tune of several billion dollars a year. We also support the Saudi royalty. And although President Obama and previous presidents have often spoken eloquently about the need for democratization, Egypt's elections are anything but democratic. Why does nothing change?

I spent virtually my entire childhood in the Middle East, and though it is not my home, I worry about it as if it were my home. I mourn for it, I fear for it -- and I also greatly fear it. Modernity, if not ever completely defeated, seems to have been put on hold throughout much of the Arab world. A worn-out, 82-year-old pharaoh still reigns in Egypt. Royalty still rules in Jordan and Saudi Arabia. Islamists still seem to be winning hearts and minds in a political vacuum.

The Egypt of my adolescence in the 1960s was a more democratic and secular society than today.
--Kai Bird                                                                                                                                                          RELATED TOPICS


Hosni Mubarak


Muslim Brotherhood

Ayman al-Zawahiri

The fact is that the Egypt of my adolescence in the 1960s was a more democratic and secular society than today. My father was an American Foreign Service officer stationed in Cairo from 1965-67. An army colonel, Gamal Abdel Nasser, was Egypt's virtual dictator. But Nasser had at least been elected president in 1956. He was a wildly popular and populist politician throughout Egypt.

Sadat was never as popular as Nasser. He had catered to the Islamists in the aftermath of Nasser's death, thinking they were not dangerous, and ending up being killed by them. Neither he nor Mubarak could have survived a truly democratic election.

Nasser became an autocrat, but at least he offered the Arabs a secular vision. Even today, Nasser remains emblematic of a lost era when hope still existed among Arabs of all classes and tribes for a modern, secular and progressive Arab nation.

Suave and articulate, Nasser exuded a quiet intelligence. His colleagues knew him to be incorruptible. He had no personal peccadilloes, aside from smoking three packs of cigarettes a day. He loved American films. His good friend the newspaper editor Mohammed Heikel claimed that Nasser loved watching Frank Capra's syrupy Christmas tale, "It's a Wonderful Life." His favorite American writer was Mark Twain. He spent an hour or two each evening reading American, French and Arabic magazines.

His closest political enemies at home were the Muslim Brotherhood, political theocrats who then attracted an insignificant following. Today, the Muslim Brotherhood would undoubtedly win any democratic election in Egypt.

But back in the 1960s, most young Arab men aspired to a secular modernity. They wanted to be engineers or doctors or lawyers -- and they admired, like Nasser did, American culture.

I lived in Cairo's upscale suburban community of Maadi, about eight miles south of the city on the eastern bank of the Nile River. I am startled to realize now that another resident of Maadi was the young Ayman al-Zawahiri.

In 1965, the future doctor and No. 2 leader of al Qaeda was attending Maadi's state-run secondary school. He was exactly my age. And like me, al-Zawahiri used to watch Hollywood films on an outdoor screen at the Maadi Sports Club.

Al-Zawahiri once aspired to a career in public health. His ambitions were the same as most young Arab men in the Nasser era. Even then he was a practicing Muslim. And his religious sensibilities did not become politically radicalized until after Nasser ordered the execution of the Muslim Brotherhood's leader, Sayyid Qutb, in 1966. But I would argue that al-Zawahiri and other young men would never have taken the road to jihadist terror had it not been for the June 1967 war.

Sadik al-Azm, the Yale-educated, Syrian philosopher, described Nasser's defeat in the June war as a "lightning bolt" and a "shock" to the Arab ethos. Nasser's humiliation spelled the defeat of the idea of a secular path to Arab modernity. Nasser's once powerful notion that the Arabic-speaking peoples of the Middle East could unite under the banner of a progressive Arab nationalist movement was now discredited.

Over time, political Islam moved into this political vacuum. Al-Zawahiri himself wrote in his 2001 memoir that the "Naksa" -- the June 1967 defeat -- "influenced the awakening of the jihadist movement."

Al-Zawahiri today is hiding in a cave in Afghanistan, or dodging drone missile attacks in Pakistan. Someday he will be a dead man, along with his pitiful co-conspirator Osama bin Laden. The jihadists don't have any thing real to offer the Arabs of the 21st century. They can't put bread on the table in this era of globalization.

Al-Azm believes the jihadists have already lost: "There may be intermittent battles in the decades to come, with many innocent victims. But the number of supporters of armed Islamism is unlikely to grow, its support throughout the Arab Muslim world will likely decline. ... September 11 signaled the last gasp of Islamism rather than the beginnings of its global challenge."

I hope so. But if Al-Azm is right, the new generation of young Arab men and women must find hope for their lives elsewhere. And so long as tired old kings and pharaohs smother their rights to democratic elections and free speech, the jihadists will still offer a desperate alternative.

The opinions in this commentary are solely those of Kai Bird.

tags: Arab World / Arab Nation / Mubarak / Emergency Law / Mubarak Regime / Sadat / Obama / Middle East / Democracy in Egypt / Moderate Islamists / Al-Zawahiri / Qaeda / Qaida / 1967 / bin Laden / / Gamal Abdel Nasser / Moderate Muslim Brotherhood / Nile River
Posted in MB in International press  
Related Articles
Mubarak's fair elections fail as security thwarts publicity
Egypt: PM expresses support for Mubarak's sixth term
Mubarak evades queries on successor
ElBaradei criticizes Egyptian govt for extending emergency law
Emergency law means more emergency for Egyptians
Barack Obama serves notice on Egypt: I meant what I said about human rights
Obama one year on, Muslims not so positive
US Secretary of State slams Egypt 's emergency law extension
Corruption report not too positive for Middle East
Why Obama needs to revamp his Egypt strategy
POMED Notes: FY2011 Appropriations and Middle East Democracy”
In Egypt, the Twilight of the Mubarak Regime
Can Obama erase ‘Bush nostalgia’ in the Middle East?
US Dances Around Stance on Democracy in Egypt
Quantifying political reform in the Arab world
ElBaradei calls for democracy in Egypt
The myth of excluding moderate Islamists in the Arab world
U.S. Committed to Democratic Reform in Arab World
Poll shows Obama making in roads in Arab world
Experts: Al-Qaeda New Generation becomes more vicious than Bin Laden and Al-Zawahiri
Looking Under My Bed For Al Qaeda
Al-Qaeda's shadow over Taliban talks
Memo to Osama bin Laden
Use of Muslim militancy to defeat Arab nationalism a massive strategic error
Al-Qaida kills eight times more Muslims than Non-Muslims
Egypt-Algeria World Cup violence used to rally support for Mubarak regime
‘Engage’ moderate Islamists, but support Muslim democrats
Al-Oadah's message to al-Zawahiri: How long will you persist in this policy of bloodshed?
The role of Moderate Islamists in the fight against terrorism, case study of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood
IN FOCUS: Mubarak Regime and Brotherhood: Zero-Sum Game
Farwana: IOA might liquidate Sadat
The 1967-war revisited
Ditching or discussing democracy in Egypt?
Sadat’s widow: My Husabnd was member of the MB
Democracy in Egypt, One Text and Twitter at a Time
Bin Laden’s aims with 9/11 and Bush’s in Iraq:
Muslim Brotherhood MP Warns Against Pollution of Nile River
Abu Zuhri: The number of Saturday victims is the highest in one day since 1967
Power Outages in Gaza, Hamas Blames Arab Nations
Hamas and al-Qaida: The Prospects for Radicalization in the Palestinian Occupied Territories
Why America is losing to al-Qaida
25 years after Sadat’s assassination, many call Egypt politically paralyzed
Some Arab Nations Mistrust Election Authorities
Dakahlia Police Drowns Young Man in The Nile River
The Moderate Muslim Brotherhood
Mursi: Passing Constitutional Amendments Worse Than 1967 Defeat
Ayman Al-Zawahiri No MB Member: Leader
The Debate About The Moderate Muslim Brotherhood Continues