To applaud El-Baradei’s “provided intention,” the Independent Campaign to Support El-Baradei for 2011 Elections, decided to collect attorneys from people to authorize El-Baradei to change the constitution; although he did not show any will or intention to change any thing. His provision to nominate himself was that the people make the change of laws first, and then if they succeed, he will nominate himself.
Egyptian opposition parties, like the el-Wafd and al-Ghad parties offered him an opportunity to be nominated through them, but he did not respond with either refusal or approval. People interpreted his “neutral response of silence” as an insistence to preserve his independence. Although, logically, this is a clear sign that he is not even interested.
Egyptian state-owned media were also affected by the illusion. They launched a very short campaign to attack El-Baradei and highlight the negative points of his career and education. El-Baradei ignored the attacks. He did not even exert the slightest effort to defend himself for the sake of preserving his image in the eyes of the Egyptian public. Some writers interpreted his “neutral response of silence” again as patience and wisdom! Although, logically, this is a clear sign of apathy and inability to argue against the regime.
When they knew about his return to Cairo, after ending his time at the IAEA, the 6th of April Movement started to mobilize youth on Facebook to receive ElBaradei at the airport. Some respectable intellectuals wrote about the prospected visit in their daily and weekly columns and mobilized the public for the same purpose, too. One of them wrote that he is expecting thousands of Egyptians to go to the airport tomorrow to receive ElBaradei. Actually, I doubt that tens of Egyptians will go, that is if ElBaradei shows up at all. I have a strong feeling that he will change his flight or delay his arrival to a secret date in application of his favorite theory of “neutral response of silence.”
Before arguing this, let’s first answer the urgent question of why we should receive him at the airport. He is only an Egyptian citizen like any one of us. He has been serving abroad for most of his life and now he is returning to spend sometime at home. I did not see similar receptions for more worthy Egyptian icons like Ahmed Zweil or Naguib Mahfouz for example. So, what is special in ElBaradei to go and receive him at the airport? What has he realistically offered to Egypt that makes him deserve us to give him this very special welcome at airport?
I wonder if E-lBaradei the almost “neutral silent” old man can really be the president of our dreams. I think he is only a false shadow of Egyptians’ lost hope.
Unlike historical leaders, El-Baradei is putting conditions on the Egyptian people before he rewards them by becoming their president. True leaders “lead” their people towards change not stay behind and ask people to do it before they step in the battlefield. Gandhi and Martin Luther King, for instance, were in front of their people not behind them in the “neutral silent zone.” If the Egyptians succeeded to change the laws and constitution, why should they need El-Baradei then?
If we avoided our passionate temper for a moment and think of El-Baradei in comparison to the other names on the political scene now, we will be surprised by what we will find out. If we criticize Mubarak senior for being the old president of a population of youth, El-Baradie is 68-years-old. If we criticize Mubarak junior for living abroad and lacking political sensitivity, El-Baradie had been living abroad since the 1960s and his career shows that he rarely practiced politics; except from his air-conditioned offices in academic institutions worldwide. All his life, El-Baradei has been an employee not a politician.
Until the moment of writing this article, El-Baradei did not take any tangible action towards achieving the change he asked the people to do on his behalf. It is us who mistakenly interpreted his “neutral silence” to every thing going around in Egypt according to what we want and dream of. In Egypt, we have wise-saying “the hungry man dreams of bread.” This is what we are doing. We are dreaming of democracy in the shape of El-Baradei; and mistakenly looking at him as the savior.